<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banning People From Online Communities Is Just a Temporary Solution.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xizor2000</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>xizor2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-991</guid>
		<description>From amdist Shadowfox vitriol, I discovered &lt;a href=&quot;http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/10/02/roy-silo-why-gay-penguins-are-not-a-good-example-for-homosexuality/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of you maybe able to find blogs or from Google entries that refute the above article, but has anyone offered those articles to Shadowfox so he can read it for himself?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We can ban Shadowfox, and in fact we can even just beat him up to a pulp and defeat him by force of arms - even to the extent of killing him. But what is going to stop ShadoxFox II from building his case and anger on the same arguments?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nazism wasn&#039;t only defeated because Hitler and his armies were defeated. It was also defeated when the German people saw what was done and  confronted with its evils to realize just how fundamentally wrong Nazism is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From amdist Shadowfox vitriol, I discovered <a href="http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/10/02/roy-silo-why-gay-penguins-are-not-a-good-example-for-homosexuality/" rel="nofollow">this </a>.</p>
<p>Some of you maybe able to find blogs or from Google entries that refute the above article, but has anyone offered those articles to Shadowfox so he can read it for himself?</p>
<p>We can ban Shadowfox, and in fact we can even just beat him up to a pulp and defeat him by force of arms &#8211; even to the extent of killing him. But what is going to stop ShadoxFox II from building his case and anger on the same arguments?</p>
<p>Nazism wasn&#8217;t only defeated because Hitler and his armies were defeated. It was also defeated when the German people saw what was done and  confronted with its evils to realize just how fundamentally wrong Nazism is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xizor2000</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>xizor2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-978</guid>
		<description>From amdist Shadowfox vitriol, I discovered &lt;a href=&quot;http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/10/02/roy-silo-why-gay-penguins-are-not-a-good-example-for-homosexuality/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt;.

Some of you maybe able to find blogs or from Google entries that refute the above article, but has anyone offered those articles to Shadowfox so he can read it for himself?

We can ban Shadowfox, and in fact we can even just beat him up to a pulp and defeat him by force of arms - even to the extent of killing him. But what is going to stop ShadoxFox II from building his case and anger on the same arguments?

Nazism wasn&#039;t only defeated because Hitler and his armies were defeated. It was also defeated when the German people saw what was done and  confronted with its evils to realize just how fundamentally wrong Nazism is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From amdist Shadowfox vitriol, I discovered <a href="http://scottthong.wordpress.com/2007/10/02/roy-silo-why-gay-penguins-are-not-a-good-example-for-homosexuality/" rel="nofollow">this </a>.</p>
<p>Some of you maybe able to find blogs or from Google entries that refute the above article, but has anyone offered those articles to Shadowfox so he can read it for himself?</p>
<p>We can ban Shadowfox, and in fact we can even just beat him up to a pulp and defeat him by force of arms &#8211; even to the extent of killing him. But what is going to stop ShadoxFox II from building his case and anger on the same arguments?</p>
<p>Nazism wasn&#8217;t only defeated because Hitler and his armies were defeated. It was also defeated when the German people saw what was done and  confronted with its evils to realize just how fundamentally wrong Nazism is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancer Evolution X</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancer Evolution X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-990</guid>
		<description>A few of these people are not really for free speech, they are riding on the free speech banner. They are supporting shadowfox because they are fundamentalist Christians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few of these people are not really for free speech, they are riding on the free speech banner. They are supporting shadowfox because they are fundamentalist Christians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not OK to incite hate against a group or any group. Hate speech is hate speech.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    &quot;In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not OK to incite hate against a group or any group. Hate speech is hate speech.</p>
<p>    &#8220;In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;</p>
<p>    And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;</p>
<p>    And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;</p>
<p>    And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancer Evolution X</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancer Evolution X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-977</guid>
		<description>A few of these people are not really for free speech, they are riding on the free speech banner. They are supporting shadowfox because they are fundamentalist Christians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few of these people are not really for free speech, they are riding on the free speech banner. They are supporting shadowfox because they are fundamentalist Christians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-976</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not OK to incite hate against a group or any group. Hate speech is hate speech.

    &quot;In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;

    And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;

    And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;

    And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not OK to incite hate against a group or any group. Hate speech is hate speech.</p>
<p>    &#8220;In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;</p>
<p>    And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;</p>
<p>    And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;</p>
<p>    And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignorantsoup</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>ignorantsoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-988</guid>
		<description>@Ridzuan. Yes I must admit your stand is pretty strong too. I don&#039;t know about porn blogs, but I guess there is a thin line between false and truths, especially when homosexuality is involved. We must thread carefully. ShadowFox seems to be trying to stir something up, especially when homosexuality is still largely a sensitive issue here, considering we just had a 377A debate a few months back. Haha.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, we should have more peace. Haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ridzuan. Yes I must admit your stand is pretty strong too. I don&#8217;t know about porn blogs, but I guess there is a thin line between false and truths, especially when homosexuality is involved. We must thread carefully. ShadowFox seems to be trying to stir something up, especially when homosexuality is still largely a sensitive issue here, considering we just had a 377A debate a few months back. Haha.</p>
<p>That said, we should have more peace. Haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignorantsoup</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>ignorantsoup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-975</guid>
		<description>@Ridzuan. Yes I must admit your stand is pretty strong too. I don&#039;t know about porn blogs, but I guess there is a thin line between false and truths, especially when homosexuality is involved. We must thread carefully. ShadowFox seems to be trying to stir something up, especially when homosexuality is still largely a sensitive issue here, considering we just had a 377A debate a few months back. Haha.

That said, we should have more peace. Haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ridzuan. Yes I must admit your stand is pretty strong too. I don&#8217;t know about porn blogs, but I guess there is a thin line between false and truths, especially when homosexuality is involved. We must thread carefully. ShadowFox seems to be trying to stir something up, especially when homosexuality is still largely a sensitive issue here, considering we just had a 377A debate a few months back. Haha.</p>
<p>That said, we should have more peace. Haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aen</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>Aen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-987</guid>
		<description>I was spreading the same kind of message about christians some time ago, my post didn&#039;t get challenged by other posts. So does that mean the Ping.sg protects homos more than christians? Or the majority of active Pingers are atheists?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was spreading the same kind of message about christians some time ago, my post didn&#8217;t get challenged by other posts. So does that mean the Ping.sg protects homos more than christians? Or the majority of active Pingers are atheists?</p>
<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uzyn</title>
		<link>http://ridz.sg/blog/2008/04/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>uzyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ridz.sg/blog/1679/banning-people-from-online-communities-is-just-a-temporary-solution/#comment-986</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just an opinion for crying out loud.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just an opinion for crying out loud.</p>
<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

